Gary
GaryVasco
Posts: 3,352
|
Post by Gary on Mar 1, 2017 1:26:23 GMT
Vasco,
Anything you can do to expand or explain paragraph 1, p. 347 would be welcome. In particular, I don't see the derivation of (7) and I wonder if $\Omega$ has some conventional significance in this context. Needham gave it two specific definitions, one for polynomials with multiple roots and one for analytic mappings with critical points. What do they have in common?
Gary
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 1, 2017 7:19:27 GMT
Vasco, Anything you can do to expand or explain paragraph 1, p. 347 would be welcome. In particular, I don't see the derivation of (7) and I wonder if $\Omega$ has some conventional significance in this context. Needham gave it two specific definitions, one for polynomials with multiple roots and one for analytic mappings with critical points. What do they have in common? Gary Gary I have included an explanation in my document on page 3 after my solution to the suggested exercise on page 346. Vasco
|
|
Gary
GaryVasco
Posts: 3,352
|
Post by Gary on Mar 1, 2017 17:43:38 GMT
Vasco, Anything you can do to expand or explain paragraph 1, p. 347 would be welcome. In particular, I don't see the derivation of (7) and I wonder if $\Omega$ has some conventional significance in this context. Needham gave it two specific definitions, one for polynomials with multiple roots and one for analytic mappings with critical points. What do they have in common? Gary Gary I have included an explanation in my document on page 3 after my solution to the suggested exercise on page 346. Vasco Vasco, That addition to the document is a great help. In the following, I have tried to gain a better understanding of the reasoning and the meaning of $\Omega$. For the case of the analytic function where $a$ is not a critical point, (f(z) - p) is the Taylor series (T[f]) of $f(z)$ minus $f(a)$ as it converges in the neighborhood of a. The first derivative dominates. $\hspace{5em}f(z) - p = T[f](a) - f(a)$ (1) For the case of the analytic function where $a$ is a critical point, $\Omega$ is the Taylor series of $f^{(n)}(z)$ at (a), where $f^{(n)}$ is the first non-vanishing derivative. The first term dominates. Note that $\Delta = (z-a)$ (from p. 346, bottom) $\hspace{5em}f(z) - p = T[f^{(n)}](a) \Delta^n$ (2) For a polynomial P with factors $(z-a)^n$, we know that $a$ is a critical point for all derivatives from $P^{(1)}$ to $P^{(n-1)}$. And we know that $P(z) = \Omega(z) A^n$. This looks very much like equation (2). What is $\Omega$? Is it the Taylor series of the first non-vanishing derivative $P^{(n)}$? Note that $A = (z-a)$ (from p. 346, paragraph 2) $\hspace{5em}? P(z) = T[P^n(z)]A^n$ (3) Gary
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 1, 2017 20:11:52 GMT
Gary
The two $\Omega$s are not the same thing. When $f$ is a polynomial $P(z)$ which has say $10$ roots $a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j$ then we can write $P$ as $P(z)=(z-a)(z-b)(z-c)...(z-j)$ a polynomial of degree 10. If four of the roots are the same, say $r$ then we can write $P$ as $P(z)=(z-r)^4(z-e)(z-f)(z-g)(z-h)(z-i)(z-j)=(z-r)^4\Omega(z)$ So you can see that $\Omega$ is a polynomial of order six.
Vasco
|
|
Gary
GaryVasco
Posts: 3,352
|
Post by Gary on Mar 2, 2017 1:20:15 GMT
Gary The two $\Omega$s are not the same thing. When $f$ is a polynomial $P(z)$ which has say $10$ roots $a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j$ then we can write $P$ as $P(z)=(z-a)(z-b)(z-c)...(z-j)$ a polynomial of degree 10. If four of the roots are the same, say $r$ then we can write $P$ as $P(z)=(z-r)^4(z-e)(z-f)(z-g)(z-h)(z-i)(z-j)=(z-r)^4\Omega(z)$ So you can see that $\Omega$ is a polynomial of order six. Vasco Vasco, Yes, I guess that should have been obvious to me. Needham defined it clearly enough. But I got wrapped up in the Taylor series and trying to see if $\Omega$ had anything to do with it. Can we say that in both cases, $\Omega$ is what is left when we factor out the difference term ($A^n$ or $\Delta^n$) whose power reveals the multiplier? We might translate $\Omega$ as "the rest of it". I feel the need for some diagrams that illustrate the multipliers of the general analytic function, the analytic function with a critical point, and the polynomial. But perhaps there is not time enough for everything one might want. Gary
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 2, 2017 7:08:33 GMT
Gary
Yes I think that is more or less it. (Shouldn't that be "multiplicity"?)
Have you glanced at the exercises at the end of the chapter yet? I think you will find there are some treats(?) in store there!
Vasco
|
|
Gary
GaryVasco
Posts: 3,352
|
Post by Gary on Mar 4, 2017 22:58:30 GMT
Gary Yes I think that is more or less it. (Shouldn't that be "multiplicity"?) Have you glanced at the exercises at the end of the chapter yet? I think you will find there are some treats(?) in store there! Vasco Vasco, "Multiplicity" it is; just used to writing "multiplier" for Mobius transformations. I will glance, but I'm still working though some murky things on p. 350 about which I will post in a few minutes. Gary
|
|