|
Post by Admin on Mar 16, 2017 7:52:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 20, 2017 7:35:13 GMT
Gary
I have made a very small modification to the very last line of my solution and re-published.
Vasco
|
|
Gary
GaryVasco
Posts: 3,352
|
Post by Gary on Apr 11, 2017 23:01:27 GMT
Vasco, Light relief? Maybe, but I'm missing a wind. Here is my first attempt. nh.ch7.ex7.pdf (122.91 KB) Gary
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 13, 2017 15:53:34 GMT
Gary
In part (ii) I think $v=-x$ not $x$ and your definition of $J$ seems to be wrong. The line of critical points is $y=1/2$. You have made a typo here and written $y=2$.
In (iii) I think $\nu(0)=-1$ and $\nu(i)=+1$.
In (iv) $h$ winds zero times round the origin - and in my opinion that's the point!
Do you disagree with my answers to parts (v) and (vi)?
Vasco
|
|
Gary
GaryVasco
Posts: 3,352
|
Post by Gary on Apr 14, 2017 2:20:30 GMT
Vasco
Yes, I transposed J causing the reversal of signs in $\nu(0)$ and $\nu(1)$.
Fixed.
Agreed. But in (vi), you wrote $\nu[h(C), i/2]$. Can you wind h(z) around a point inside $\Gamma$?
Regarding (v), in my new posting, I argue that there are actually three loops of $z$ and $\bar{z}$ round $\Gamma$ resulting in zero winds for the reason you stated in (iv), i.e. the loops in h(z) do not wind round 0. These three winds help to make sense of the plot.
Regarding (vi), see above.
Gary
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 14, 2017 9:02:56 GMT
Gary
The last line of my document in part (vi) contains a typo and an error, it should read:
"...we find that $\nu[h(C),0]=0=\nu(i/2)$
I realised that $i/2$ in the square brackets was a typo and should have been zero, and after reading your posts and document I concluded that $\nu(i/2)=0$ not $-1$. I have updated my document to reflect these changes.
Part (iv)
Since the exercise asks us to find the image curve traced by $h(z)$ as $z=2e^{i\theta}$ traverses the circle $|z|=2$, I think that finding three loops overcomplicates the situation unnecessarily.
The image curve $h$ is just the circle centred at $4$ with radius $2$, the right hand circle in your figure 1, and you can see that it does not encircle the origin and so $\nu[h(C),0]=0$, which is confirmed by the TAP for $z=0$ and $z=i$ inside $\Gamma$.
Part (v)
In the analysis of [8] in the book $h(z)$ is written as $ABC$ and in our case $A=\bar{z}=(\bar{z}-0)$ and $B=(z-i)$ and $C=1$ and so we have to consider what $A$ and $B$ do as $z$ goes round $\Gamma$ and then add their windings together to find the winding of $h(\Gamma)$ round $0$.
Part (vi)
In this part we do exactly the same as in part (v), but use $\Gamma$ as the small circle (radius $\epsilon$) centred at $z=i/2$. So as $z$ traverses $\epsilon e^{i\theta}$ we must find what $A=\bar{z}$ does and what $B=(z-i)$ does and add their windings together to get the total winding of $h(\Gamma)$ about the origin.
Vasco
|
|
Gary
GaryVasco
Posts: 3,352
|
Post by Gary on Apr 14, 2017 16:41:41 GMT
Vasco,
That clarifies the problem quite a lot.
Agreed. It works out algebraically, but since the two might-have-been loops cancel from the start and dissolve into a constant, there is no point in plotting them.
Gary
|
|