|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 13, 2019 9:26:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 14, 2019 19:53:57 GMT
There was a typo in the third equation from the end of my document. The two occurrences of $u$ on the RHS of the first equals sign should both be $v$.
I have corrected this and republished.
Vasco/Admin
|
|
Gary
GaryVasco
Posts: 3,352 
|
Post by Gary on Jan 14, 2019 22:17:46 GMT
There was a typo in the third equation from the end of my document. The two occurrences of $u$ on the RHS of the first equals sign should both be $v$. I have corrected this and republished. Vasco/Admin It's hard to keep track of all the little u's, v's, x's and y's. I didn't notice. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 14, 2019 23:04:58 GMT
There was a typo in the third equation from the end of my document. The two occurrences of $u$ on the RHS of the first equals sign should both be $v$. I have corrected this and republished. Vasco/Admin It's hard to keep track of all the little u's, v's, x's and y's. I didn't notice. Yes, a point in favour of using the techniques detailed in section III, A Powerful Computational Tool, rather than 'brute force'. I feel sure that this must be one of the main reasons for Needham setting this exercise: to help us to see the massive advantages of these computational tools - less effort to achieve important and accurate results. Vasco/Admin |
|
Gary
GaryVasco
Posts: 3,352
|
Post by Gary on Jan 15, 2019 1:22:26 GMT
It's hard to keep track of all the little u's, v's, x's and y's. I didn't notice. Yes, a point in favour of using the techniques detailed in section III, A Powerful Computational Tool, rather than 'brute force'. I feel sure that this must be one of the main reasons for Needham setting this exercise: to help us to see the massive advantages of these computational tools - less effort to achieve important and accurate results. Vasco/Admin Vasco,
I agree with you both: a really powerful computational tool set.
Gary
|
|
