|
Post by mondo on Nov 12, 2022 18:17:52 GMT
On the top of page 157 author shows a matrix $\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$ and says it corresponds to a Mobius transformation $M(z) = -\frac{1}{z}$. But why? We have some complex number $z = a + ib$, if we multiply it by above matrix we get \begin{pmatrix} -b \\ a \end{pmatrix} hence $M(z) = -b + ia$. So we transformed $z = a + ib$ into $M(z) = -b + ia$ and to me it corresponds to a transformation $iz = i(a + ib) = ia - b$.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 12, 2022 20:48:13 GMT
Mondo
Have you read the part of section VI on page 156? It explains everything there! If the matrix represents a Mobius transformation then the matrix above corresponds to the Mobius transformation where $a=0, b=1,c=1,d=0$ which is $\frac{0z-1}{1z+0}=-(1/z)$.
Every matrix can be interpreted as a linear transformation or a Mobius transformation. After the first paragraph on page 157 Needham uses square brackets and round brackets to make the distinction. Also if brackets are not used at all as for example in (39) on page 164 then $M$ and $F$ etc represent transformations not matrices.
Vasco
|
|
|
Post by mondo on Dec 2, 2022 4:31:48 GMT
Ok, thank you Vasco, I think it is clear now, I wasn't reading carful enough and got confused by the example at the end of the page 156.
|
|