doug
New Member
Posts: 6
|
Post by doug on Oct 27, 2024 5:47:10 GMT
Why is the exponent on -1 in the final expression equal to m+1 rather than m-1? That is, for the final term of the series on the LHS, I thought that the upper bound of summation of m-1 would take the place of r as the exponent. I can see that when r = m-1 is substituted into 2r+1 that 2m - 1 becomes the lower term of the binomial coefficient in the final term. In terms of the even/odd split with n = 2m even, an upper bound of summation of m to go with 2r, and an upper bound of m-1 to go with 2r+1, appears to be correct based on working out some simple examples. So what am I missing?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 27, 2024 9:55:10 GMT
Doug
You are right. The exponent of $(-1)$ in the last term of the series in the two final expressions should be $m-1$. So the final two expressions in my answer and in the book should be:
$\displaystyle\sum^{m-1}_{r=0}\binom{2m}{2r+1}(-1)^r=\binom{2m}{1}-\binom{2m}{3}+\binom{2m}{5}- ... +(-1)^{m-1}\binom{2m}{2m-1}$
and
$\displaystyle\binom{2m}{1}-\binom{2m}{3}+\binom{2m}{5}- ... +(-1)^{m-1}\binom{2m}{2m-1}=2^m\sin(m\pi/2)$
Thanks for pointing this out.
I will add this to the book errata for chapter 1 in the forum
The reason you got the right answer for some examples is because $(-1)^{m+1}$ is equal to $(-1)^{m-1}$.
$(-1)^{m+1}=(-1)^m\cdot (-1)^{+1}={(-1)}^m\cdot {(-1)}^{-1}=(-1)^{m-1}$
Vasco
|
|
doug
New Member
Posts: 6
|
Post by doug on Oct 27, 2024 16:46:19 GMT
OK, and thx again for these answers, I'm learning as much from the exercises as the book. I feel a little better now after the thousand other times I thought there was a mistake but I was just confused; there are remarkably few errors in either the book or the answers.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 27, 2024 19:06:23 GMT
Doug
Yes it's very important to do the exercises I found. Resist the temptation to rush on to the next chapter. When you've read a chapter you tend to think you have understood it all but when you do the exercises only then do you find out whether you really have.
My answers were all scrutinised by Gary and I did the same for his. That's why there are very few errors in them.
Vasco
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 28, 2024 10:13:43 GMT
I have corrected my answer, and the links to it on this forum should now lead you to the amended version, as described in this thread.
Vasco/Admin
|
|